If you create your own recovery system like I did you can always switch back and fourth between zfs-dkms and zfs-linux-lts to see which you prefer. If you are not concerned with compile times go ahead and use the zfs-dkms package. In that case switching from zfs-dkms to zfs-linux-lts may have saved the day. I found this out on my test system so it did not cause me any down time. However there was a time when the LTS kernel versioned, and there was an issue with dkms support which prevented me from upgrading. When the LTS kernel went from 5.10.x to 5.15.x zfs-dkms compiled with no issues. I can tell you that since standardizing on the LTS kernel I have had no out-of-sync issues with Linux and OpenZFS. Would the upgrade fail altogether or would zfs fail to compile or install after upgrading linux-lts? Sorry for bumping this old thread, but what combination would you suggest using to get the most stability, given that I don't care about compile times? Using the LTS kernel with zfs-linux-lts or with zfs-dkms? I imagine using zfs-linux-lts would cause delays in kernel updates, but I'm not sure how that would play out. The next step is to use the linux-lts kernel since its supported by OpenZFS. I have to wait a few minutes for the zfs module to compile but its better than waiting a few days for the zfs-linux package to update. Then I switched from zfs-linux to zfs-dkms and that problem went away. I got really tired of dealing with the zfs-linux and kernel packages going out of sync.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |